Comparative housing research is hindered by attempts to provide broad empirical categorisations of types of Housing Regimes and their equivalents and sweeping cross-country generalisations about their effects. Regime theory is right to recognise the housing provision is and can be organised in different ways but proselytises too strongly. Real issues and policy debates in countries are instead embedded in the existence of specific, tenure related, networks of housing provision and they widely differ across the world. Taking that on board can lead to more fruitful understandings.

Please, login first to add a comment.
Author: Michael Ball
Document Type: article
ISSN: 2336-2839
Volume: 7
Issue: 1
Pages: 36-48
DOI code: 10.13060/23362839.2020.7.1.502
Date of publication: 4.6.2020


Copyright 2013 Critical Housing Analysis
RSS
Site map