Portuguese Reactions to the Housing Crisis: Is It Possible to Move from the Residualisation to Post-neoliberalisation of Housing Policies?

For decades, the analysis of housing policies in Portugal has focused on its distinct trajectory compared to those of other countries in western and northern Europe. However, the rise of the housing affordability crisis and the civic, media and political prominence that the housing issue has acquired in recent years have highlighted important similarities (despite some key specifics) with the dynamics that have been occurring internationally. This article discusses Portuguese political reactions to the affordability crisis. It presents a critical discussion of the ambitious multi-measure policy package ‘Mais Habitação’ (More Housing), including its content, the political conditions of its introduction, and its public reception - in the light of the recent international debates on the paths, possibilities, and obstacles to the post-neoliberalisation of housing policies.

43 views

References

Allegretti, G., N. Dias 2019. ‘Participação cívica e políticas habitacionais. Que desafios para Portugal?’ Cidades. Comunidades e Territórios 38. https://doi.org/10.15847/citiescommunitiesterritories.jun2019.038.ens04

Alves, S. 2017. ‘Poles apart? A comparative study of housing policies and outcomes in Portugal and Denmark.’ Housing, Theory and Society 34 (2): 221-248.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2016.1236036

Arundel, R., J. Doling 2017. ‘The end of mass homeownership? Changes in labor markets and housing tenure opportunities across Europe.’ Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 32: 649-672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-017-9551-8

Bengtsson, B., S. Kohl 2020. ‘Incremental change in housing regimes: some theoretical propositions with empirical illustrations.’ Critical Housing Analysis 7 (1): 15-24.

http://dx.doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2020.7.1.500

Blackwell, T., S. Kohl 2019. ‘Historicizing housing typologies: beyond welfare state regimes and varieties of residential capitalism.’ Housing Studies 34 (2): 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1487037  

Borg, I. 2018. ‘Universalism lost? The magnitude and spatial pattern of residualisation in the public housing sector in Sweden 1993–2012.’ Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 34: 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-018-09638-8

Brand, U., N. Sekler 2009. ‘Postneoliberalism: a catch-all word or valuable analytical und politica concept? - Aims of a beginning debate.’ Pp. 5-14 in U. Brand, N. Sekler (eds.)

Postneoliberalism - A beginning debate. Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.

Brenner, N., J. Peck and N. Theodore 2010. ‘After neoliberalization?’ Globalizations 7 (3): 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731003669669

Byrne, M. 2022. ‘Post-neoliberalization and the Irish private rental sector.’ Housing Studies 39 (7): 1658-1677. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2022.2137474

Chapple, K., A. Loukaitou-Sideris, A. Miller, C. Zeger 2023. ‘The role of local housing policies in preventing displacement: A literature review.’ Journal of Planning Literature 38 (2): 200-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221137859

Cocola-Gant, A., A. Gago 2021. ‘Airbnb, buy-to-let investment and tourism-driven displacement: A case study in Lisbon.’ Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 53 (7): 1671-1688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19869012

Elsinga, M. 2020. ‘About housing systems and underlying ideologies.’ Housing, Theory and Society 37 (5): 557-561. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1816572

Flamant, E., S. Godar, G. Richard 2021. ‘New forms of tax competition in the European Union: An empirical investigation’. Eutax Observatory. Retrieved 24 October 2024 from https://www.taxobservatory.eu//www-site/uploads/2021/11/EU-Tax-Observatory-Report-3-Tax-Competition-November-2021-3.pdf

Galster, G., K. O. Lee 2020. ‘Housing affordability: a framing, synthesis of research and policy, and future directions.’ International Journal of Urban Sciences 25 (1): 7-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2020.1713864

Hilber, C., O. Schöni 2022. ‘Housing policy and affordable housing.’ Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved 24 October 2024 from https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/occasional/op056.pdf

Hochstenbach, C. 2023. ‘Balancing accumulation and affordability: How Dutch housing politics moved from private-rental liberalization to regulation.’ Housing, Theory and Society 40 (4): 503-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2023.2218863

Lutz, E., M. Wicki, D. Kaufmann 2024. ‘Creating inequality in access to public transit? Densification, gentrification, and displacement.’ Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science (in press). First published online April 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241242883

Marquardt, S., D. Glaser 2023. ‘How much state and how much market? Comparing social housing in Berlin and Vienna.’ German Politics 32 (2): 361-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2020.1771696

Marsh, A., K. Gibb, A. M. Soaita 2023. ‘Rent regulation: unpacking the debates.’ International Journal of Housing Policy 23 (4): 734-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2022.2089079 

Mendes, L. 2018. ‘Tourism Gentrification in Lisbon: The Panacea of Touristification as a Scenario of a Post-capitalist Crisis.’ Pp. 25-46 in I. David (ed.) Crisis, Austerity and Transformation: How Disciplinary Neoliberalism Is Changing Portugal. London: Lexington.

Mota, N. 2019. ‘From house to home: Social control and emancipation in Portuguese Public Housing, 1926–76.’ Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 78 (2): 208-226. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2019.78.2.208

Pereira, S. M.. 2022a. ‘Regulation of short-term rentals in Lisbon: strike a balance between tourism dependence and urban life.’ Urban Research & Practice 15 (4): 477-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1842901

Pereira, S. M. 2022b. ‘Consolidação de uma tendência: o recuo da propriedade.’ in Mamede, R., (ed.) Estado da Nação e as políticas públicas 2022. Recuperação em tempos de incerteza. Retrieved 24 October 2024 from https://ipps.iscte-iul.pt/images/PDF/EstadoNacao/ENPP2022/Relatorio_ENPP_2022_IPPS.pdf

Pinto, T. C., I. Guerra 2019. ‘Housing policies, market and home ownership in Portugal. Beyond the cultural model.’ Cidades. Comunidades e Territórios 39.
https://journals.openedition.org/cidades/1638

Schipper, S. 2015. ‘Towards a ‘Post-Neoliberal’ mode of housing regulation? The Israeli social protest of summer 2011.’ International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (6): 1137–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12318

Vidal, L., J. Gil, M. A. Martínez 2024. ‘Accommodating ‘generation rent’: Unsettling dominant discourses on rental housing reform in Catalonia and Spain.’ Urban Studies 61 (11). First published online March 4, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241228438

Vogelpohl, A., T. Buchholz 2017. ‘Breaking with neoliberalization by restricting the housing market: Novel urban policies and the case of Hamburg.’ International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41 (2): 266-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12490 

Wetzstein, S. 2017. ‘The global urban housing affordability crisis.’ Urban Studies 54 (14): 3159-3177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017711649

Wetzstein, S. 2021. ‘Assessing post-GFC housing affordability interventions: a qualitative exploration across five international cities.’ International Journal of Housing Policy 21 (1): 70-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2019.1662639 

Wijburg, G. 2021. ‘The governance of affordable housing in post-crisis Amsterdam and Miami.’ Geoforum 119: 30-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.12.013

Please, login first to add a comment.
Document Type
article
ISSN
2336-2839
Volume / Issue
11 / 2
Pages
204-215
Date of publication
6.12.2024
Keywords:

Cite this article

copy
Pereira, S. 2024. ‘Portuguese Reactions to the Housing Crisis: Is It Possible to Move from the Residualisation to Post-neoliberalisation of Housing Policies?.’ Critical Housing Analysis 11 (2): 204-215. https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2024.11.2.578