The Influence of Interest Organisations on Swedish Rental Housing – Implications for Corporatist Theory

Authors: Bo Bengtsson ID, Martin Grander ID

Although academic definitions of ‘corporatism’ differ, the concept is generally about organisational influence on state politics. Around 1980, Sweden was regarded as the archetype of welfare-state corporatism, but around the turn of the millennium the broad representation of organised interests in state politics was largely abolished. However, in the housing sector, strong interest organisations have continued to play a dominant and institutionalised role. Rents are negotiated collectively between organisations of estate owners and tenants, and these organisations also have strong influence on rental legislation and on housing policy more generally. We argue that this system should be seen as corporatist and to that end suggest a somewhat modified version of Philippe Schmitter’s well-established definition of corporatism. We claim that our ‘view from housing’ may contribute to the increased relevance of corporatism theory also in studies of other welfare sectors where market distribution is increasingly important.

PDF

13 views

References

Adams, C. T. 1987. ‘The Politics of Privatization.’ Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 4 (sup 1): 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02815737.1987.10801429

Bengtsson, B., M. Grander. 2023. Bostadsfrågan som politik och intressekamp. Malmö: Égalité.

Cawson, A. 1986. Corporatism and Political Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Clapham, D., P. Kemp, S. J. Smith. 1990. Housing and Social Policy. Basingstoke & London: Macmillan.

Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA & London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Doling, J. 1997. Comparative Housing Policy: Government and Housing in Advanced Industrialized Countries. Basingstoke & London: Macmillan and New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Gustavsson, S. 1980 ‘Housing, Building, and Planning.’ Pp. 168-184 in L. Lewin, E. Vedung (eds.) Politics as Rational Action. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8955-9

Headey, B. 1978. Housing Policy in the Developed Economy. London: Croom Helm.

Hermansson, J. 1993. Politik som intressekamp. Stockholm: Norstedts.

Hermansson, J., T. Svensson, P. Öberg 1997. ‘Vad blev det av den svenska korporatismen?’ Politica 29 (4): 365–384. https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v29i4.68159

Hernes, G. 1978. Makt og avmakt. En begrepsanalyse. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

Kadioğlu, D., I. Kellecioglu, C. Listerborn 2022. 'Ägarbyten på den privata hyresmarknaden – företagen och den lokala organiseringen.' in B. Bengtsson, M. Holdo, E. Holmqvist (eds.) Allas rätt till bostad. Marknadens begränsningar och samhällets ansvar. Göteborg: Daidalos.

Kemeny, J. 1995 From Public Housing to the Social Market: Rental Policy Strategies in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.

Kemeny, J. 2006 ‘Corporatism and Housing Regimes.’ Housing, Theory and Society 23 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090500375423

Lewin, L. 1992. Samhället och de organiserade intressena. Stockholm: Norstedts.

Lundqvist, L. J. 1988 Housing Policy and Tenures in Sweden. The Quest for Neutrality. Aldershot & Brookfield, Vermont: Avebury.

Meyerson, P.-M., I. Ståhl, K. Wickman 1990. Makten över bostaden. Stockholm: SNS.

Öberg, P. 1994. Särintresse och allmänintresse: Korporatismens ansikten. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

Offe, C. 1985. Disorganized Capitalism. Contemporary Transformations of Work and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Rolf, H. 2020. En fackförening för hemmen. Kollektiv mobilisering, hyresgästorganisering och maktkamp på hyresmarknaden i Stockholm och Göteborg 1875–1942. Stockholm: Ersta Sköndal Bräcke högskola.

Rothstein, B., J. Bergström 1999. Korporatismens fall och den svenska modellens kris. Stockholm: SNS.

Sartori, G. 1984. 'Guidelines for Concept Analysis.' Pp. 97-150 in G. Sartori (ed.) Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. London, Sage.

Saunders, P. 1986. Social Theory and the Urban Question. London: Routledge.

Schmitter, P. C. 1974. ‘Still the Century of Corporatism?’ Review of Politics 36 (1): 85–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500022178

Svensson, T. 1994. Socialdemokratins dominans. En studie av den svenska socialdemokratins partistrategi. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

Tsebelis, G. 1990. Nested Games. Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

von der Leyen, U. 2024. ‘Mission letter to Dan Jørgensen, Commissioner-designate for Energy and Housing.’ European Commission. Retrieved 9 December, 2024 from https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/1c203799-0137-482e-bd18-4f6813535986_en?filename=Mission%20letter%20-%20JORGENSEN.pdf

Williamson, P. J. 1989. Corporatism in Perspective. An Introductory Guide to Corporatist Theory. London: Sage.

Please, login first to add a comment.
Document Type
article
ISSN
2336-2839
Volume / Issue
11 / 2
Pages
166-174
https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2024.11.2.574
Date of publication
10.12.2024
Keywords:
private rented markets , social housing , welfare policy

Cite this article

copy
Bengtsson, B. , M. Grander 2024. ‘The Influence of Interest Organisations on Swedish Rental Housing – Implications for Corporatist Theory.’ Critical Housing Analysis 11 (2): 166-174. https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2024.11.2.574